The headline read: "Daryl Hannah Is Pregnant at the Age of 60 with Husband Neil Young, Couple Expecting a Baby Boy!" We stumbled upon similar stories on and. The satirical story spread well beyond its Madhouse Magazine origins, including in a Sept. "There was no IVF or anything like that, me and Neil did it the old fashioned way by humping like jackrabbits." "I have the Uterus of a 20 year old and the eggs of a teenager", said Hannah. Giving birth at age 60 may be rare, but just last year a 74 year old woman in India gave birth to twins. "You better stand back" said Neil to the female reporters, "You might get pregnant standing too close to me!" Just because theres snow on the roof don't mean theres no fire in the basement!" Neil then did a few pelvic thrusts to emphasize his virility. "I understand we are up there in age, but don't let these old grey temples fool ya now. Neil Young, 75, was giddy with excitement as he gushed at the prospect of a new baby. Several months later, several Twitter users spread the satirical story and described Hannah as becoming pregnant at age 61, not 60, around the time of her birthday, Dec. It is quite rare to become pregnant after age 50, but she's one of a growing number of older new mothers in the United States - a trend that's bolstered by changing societal norms and new advances in fertility treatments. Hannah, 60, is in good health and is being monitored. Young made the announcement on social media as he posted an image holding a "Prego" tomato sauce jar with the caption, "We are Prego!" The article originated with a website that labeled its stories as being satirical in nature.Īccording to the satirical story, Hannah became pregnant at age 60 and made the announcement on social media:Ī spokesman confirmed that Neil Young's wife, Daryl Hannah, is pregnant. This item was not a factual recounting of real-life events. Better to leave history as it was, butts and all.The Madhouse Magazine website had a disclaimer page that described its stories as satire. And, now that we are getting most of our content digitally, how do we know what was the “original” version anyway? Past movies can be tinkered with endlessly, in ways their creators never intended. Next it might put a nappy on Simba and a T-shirt over the Little Mermaid’s scallop-shell bikini. In the globalised marketplace of cultural taboos, we are in danger of sanitising everything to an absurd degree. There is a worrying air of propriety to Disney’s slashing of Splash. (He has since backtracked and reinstated the guns.) In his 20th anniversary reissue of ET, Steven Spielberg substituted the clunky animatronic ET for a more convincing CGI model in some scenes (just wait till he gets around to Jaws), but he also digitally replaced the guns in the hands of the pursuing cops with walkie-talkies, thus softening the sentiment. Good luck finding the original “Han shoots first” version anywhere it is no longer commercially available.ĭisney is not alone here. The two were together for 10 years before the romance ended in 1992. But in the re-edited version, he doesn’t: Greedo shoots first. Hannah met the musician, 12 years her senior, as a teen when he visited Chicago for a concert. In one key scene, Han Solo kills the bounty hunter Greedo in cold blood. George Lucas added new CGI creatures to the 1997 reissue of A New Hope but also adjusted a crucial plot point. Star Wars fans have become accustomed to this constant making-over. First they came for the cigarette butts, then they came for Daryl Hannah’s. Elsewhere, Disney’s main concerns have been swearing, violence and particularly smoking hence the digital removal of cigarettes from both old cartoons and even photographs of Walt Disney (who was a heavy smoker). A sequence from the credits sequence of Toy Story 2 – where Stinky Pete propositions two Barbie dolls – has also been quietly removed. You will not find the notorious Song of the South on Disney+ or the original, racist lyrics of Aladdin’s opening number. Disney, especially, has been guilty of this, what with all the politically incorrect skeletons in its closet. Retrospective tweaking to movies has been going on for decades but in the digital age it has become easier than ever to cover your tracks. What else is being altered without our knowledge? A forgotten 80s comedy may not be the hill most cinephiles would choose to die on, but we should still be concerned. It looks as if she is wearing a hairy skirt. In the 1984 original, Hannah’s blond hair just about covers her naked bottom in the new version, that hair has been digitally extended to cover her entire buttock area – and badly at that. There is a shot of Daryl Hannah diving into the sea, having just kissed a dumbstruck Tom Hanks. Hot on the heels of Cats’ digital dalliance with CGI nether regions comes another bum-related movie controversy: viewers have noticed some unsubtle changes to the mermaid romcom Splash as it appears on Disney+.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |